Google Maps and the dashed line between Ceuta and Melilla: what's behind it

  • Google Maps represents the land boundaries of Ceuta and Melilla with a dashed gray line because it classifies them as disputed borders.
  • The company claims to maintain neutrality and to use different symbols for undisputed, provisional, de facto, or disputed borders.
  • The representation is not new: it has been documented since at least 2020 and by 2023 it had already generated criticism.
  • Morocco claims both autonomous cities, but the UN does not consider them territories pending decolonization.

Google Maps interface on a screen

There are details on Google Maps that go unnoticed until someone points them out. One of them appears when zooming in on the land borders of Ceuta and Melilla with Morocco: instead of a continuous gray line, the map shows a broken line. This design isn't a mistake or a recent addition, but rather a way of representing borders where there are conflicting positions.

The question has resurfaced on social media amidst migratory tensions in the region, but available data suggests that Google did not recently modify the map . For years, the company has applied its own criteria to distinguish between undisputed borders and those it considers provisional, de facto, or disputed.

Related article:
Google Maps and the controversy over the dashed line in Ceuta and Melilla

What do you see when you zoom in on the map?

When searching for the two autonomous cities and zooming in on the border with Morocco, Google Maps displays a dashed gray line . This same style is not used for most of the border between Spain and Portugal, where a solid line appears. The difference is not due to the terrain or the quality of the mapping, but rather to the political classification that the platform assigns to each section.

Google's official help explains that international borders it considers undisputed are shown with solid gray lines. For provisional, de facto, or disputed borders, it uses different lines. Specifically, so-called contested borders appear with dashed lines when the countries involved disagree on the definition of the boundary.

Google Maps map with borders

Why does Google use dashed lines?

The company maintains that its objective is to remain neutral in geopolitical debates and to objectively represent the disputed territories. As it explained to fact-checking organizations, it consults information from international cartographic authorities, including the United Nations, to determine these boundaries. However, it does not specify which particular sources led to the classification of Ceuta and Melilla as they are defined.

That divided line doesn't equate to a recognition of sovereignty or a legal decision about who owns the cities. It's a cartographic convention to indicate that the political reality of a border isn't always uniform. Google uses different styles precisely so that the user perceives that there are peaceful boundaries and others about which there is no consensus.

Google Maps
Related article:
Google Maps gets a makeover: new features, tips and precautions for drivers and pedestrians

The origin of the claim

The underlying context is the difference in positions between Spain and Morocco. Ceuta and Melilla are part of the Spanish state and have the status of autonomous cities . Morocco has maintained a claim over both territories for decades, making this border a sensitive issue.

In 1975, Morocco petitioned the United Nations to consider the two cities as territories pending decolonization . The petition was unsuccessful. Currently, the UN does not include Ceuta or Melilla on its list of non-self-governing territories, an important distinction for understanding that the Google Maps line has no legal standing.

A controversy that is not new

The representation has attracted attention at various times. During the Ceuta migration crisis, some social media posts interpreted it as Google having changed its maps. However, the timeline doesn't match: the dashed line was already there at least since 2020 , when a user inquired about it in the Google Maps community forum.

In 2023, the issue resurfaced in news reports and criticisms regarding the platform's criteria. Therefore, this is not a reaction to migration events nor a measure taken in response to current political events. The company has not presented this representation as a recent change , but rather as part of its standard practice.

Google Maps errors
Related article:
Google Maps continues to cause scares and traffic jams in small towns: the fight of municipalities to correct its routes

What it means and what it doesn't mean

The key is not to confuse a symbol with a legal ruling. Google's use of a dashed line means it considers that border a matter of dispute , not that it's deciding which country Ceuta and Melilla belong to. Effective sovereignty belongs to Spain, while Morocco maintains its claim, and this divergence is what's reflected on the map.

Google also distinguishes between different types of borders. Those that are not controversial are drawn with a solid line; provisional, de facto, or disputed borders may appear with a dashed line. This graphic scale serves to alert the user that not all borders on the planet are interpreted the same way.

The Spanish and European context

Attention to this detail comes at a time of debate about relations between Spain and Morocco and the situation at the border . The arrival of people in Ceuta during the summer and the ongoing migratory pressure have kept the city in the spotlight, leading to a closer examination of any element related to its status.

For Europe, the case is also of interest because it shows how global technology platforms apply cartographic criteria that can clash with national perceptions. In the case of Ceuta and Melilla, the dashed line does not alter Spanish sovereignty or the official UN position, but it does reflect the existence of a political dispute on the ground.

What appears on Google Maps is, ultimately, a way of depicting a complex reality. The dashed line does not represent a loss of sovereignty, a regulatory change, or a new development caused by the migration crisis. It is a symbol that the company has used for years to mark borders it considers disputed , while Ceuta and Melilla remain Spanish autonomous cities and Morocco maintains its historical claim.


Add as preferred source in Google